debunking the cul-de-sac

Descend from 40,000 feet into just about any major metropolitan airport in the United States, and patterns of the trajectory of American life over the last century become clearly visible. Old urban cores are etched out in tight grids modeled off a sheet of graph paper. Further out, all those neat lines and right angles begin their curling meander into suburbia. Sparsely populated roads loop through the countryside in an odd geometry designed around the residential real estate dream of post-war America: a cul-de-sac for every family. “I think it’s a missed opportunity when I’m flying and I can’t look out the window and see what the patterns are,” says Norman Garrick, an associate professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Connecticut.

via www.theatlanticcities.com

Who here hates cul-de-sacs as much as I do? In my experience, they are the enemy of old-house walkable neighborhoods in every possible sense.

2 Comments on “debunking the cul-de-sac

  1. I agree with you, cul-de-sacs are the antithesis of a creative and engaged community. They invoke a defender attitude amongst the inhabitants which, at its best, evokes the Pioneer in early America bunkered in their circle of covered wagons having time alone with known family . At worst, it encourages a culture of fear of the Stranger and encourages radical and murderous xenophobia.
    With the globe now newly covered in such holstein-style homogenising concrete circles of spiritual suffocation, expect a horribly predictable but seemingly anarchic reaction of violence against self and others.
    All evil is but Ignorance (Dame Julian of Norwich)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *