architecture

  • Sacramento’s Cranston-Geary house

    Sacramento Craftsman home

    This past Wednesday, I mentioned Sacramento’s Cranston-Geary House in passing. An enormous, beautiful, and somewhat unorthodox Craftsman home just a few blocks from my house, it’s one of Sacramento’s large number of National Register of Historic Places structures and is, from what I’ve heard, completely restored to its original luster inside and out. I wouldn’t mind taking a peek inside and posting a photo gallery here, if I can get around to contacting the owners.

    Interesting fact: the architect, George C. Sellon, was California’s first state architect – as well as the designer of San Quentin Prison. Thanks to Sacramento Historic House for that tidbit!

  • Sacramento Historic House

    Tracy Doolittle lives here in Sacramento and is just as much a fan of our beautiful old houses as I am. For $300, she’ll do very extensive history on your home, finding out a timeline (and biographical highlights) of its past owners & residents, a permit history, the original property or historic neighborhood map, and other information – including, sometimes, historic photographs. She has also written a how-to article if you’d like to attempt this yourself.

    A useful service, certainly. Tracy also has a website, Sacramento Historic House, which profiles several representative properties (including the beautiful and enormous Cranston-Geary house, in whose listing she gives a shout-out to us). Several of the most impressive Victorians are already listed, and it looks like she’s adding new structures all the time. There’s a blog, too, with many recent entries focusing on the historic homes and castles she encountered on a recent trip to London.

  • “the house that sausage built” on SFgate.com

    Cmaidell07_ph11_0498977651
    The San Francisco Chronicle’s online edition, SFgate.com, has a nice story (and pictures, but I wish there were more see notes at bottom) of Bruce Aidells – of Aidells’ chicken sausage fame – beautiful new A&C home. Read the entire article at SFGate.com. (photo by Jeannie O’Connor)

    It started innocently enough – Bruce Aidells bought some English
    Arts and Crafts furniture from an Oakland antiques dealer and designed
    his kitchen in Kensington around it. Then he began frequenting the
    House of Orange, an Alameda antique shop that specializes in Arts and
    Crafts. He might have stopped there, but a fateful invitation in 1996
    to visit Berkeley’s Thorsen House with an architecturally inclined
    friend introduced him to the architecture of Charles and Henry Greene,
    and he was instantly captivated. He befriended Ted Bosley, the curator
    of the Gamble House, a Greene and Greene house museum in Pasadena, as
    well as Jack Stumpf, the chief docent at the house, who, as it turned
    out, was also a sausage aficionado. Soon Aidells was getting the
    private tour of the Gamble house (whether bribes of bratwurst were
    involved is unknown). He began to want a Greene and Greene of his own,
    but realized that to build one properly would require a good deal of
    money, which he did not have at the time. He settled for immersing
    himself in Greene and Greene, buying books, visiting other houses and
    museums, and biding his time.

    The opportunity came in 2002, when Aidells sold his interest in the
    eponymous sausage company he started in 1983. He figures the cost of
    the house came out to 322 miles of sausages. Finally having enough
    money in his pocket, he began looking for an architect who knew how to
    design a Greene and Greene-style house. He eventually settled on Greg
    Klein of John Malick and Associates, even though the company had never
    before designed a Greene and Greene house. But it was local, and
    Aidells felt they would be hands-on. Klein had long been a fan of the
    Greenes, and says, "Their work is unique, and most people think no one
    does that anymore."

    Editor’s note: thanks to reader Ann for noting that the architect’s website has many more images of the house; Danielle, with John Malick & Associates, the folks who designed the house, also supplies us with this URL for photos by Healdsburg photographer Jeannie O’Connor.

  • looking for show homes

    Do you have a beautiful Craftsman home in Connecticut, Westchester, Palm Beach or the Hamptons that you’d like to show off in an Architectural Digest style magazine story in large regional & national magazines? If so, please contact me no later than Noon on September 4, 2008, and I’ll put you in touch with a journalist who wants to talk to you.

  • living in a bigger home – without remodeling

    Our friend Joel McDonald sends the following dispatch:

    Does your house seem too small? There are a few inexpensive things
    you can do that will make your home seem larger to guests and
    prospective buyers. This can certainly be an advantage when you are
    selling a smaller home. You may well like the results enough to reduce
    the urgency of moving!

    1. Wall Color – Use colors that give a warm feeling such as red,
      orange and browns. These colors can make a room look larger and more
      welcoming. To give a room added depth, you might want to try the
      approach of using light shades on three walls of the room and a
      coordinated darker tone of the same color on the other one.
    2. Using Light – When your home is small, lighting becomes very
      important. To make a room appear larger there should be plenty of light
      to increase an impression of being unconfined. Shine lights on walls so
      they will look brighter. Consider having controls installed that will
      allow you to adjust the intensity of the lighting in each room for
      different times of day.
    3. Minimize the Furniture – Rooms that have too much furniture in
      them will look smaller. The more crowded a room is, the smaller it will
      appear. Be sure not to crowd your furniture together when you want to
      make a room look larger. Avoid putting large armchairs and sofas in
      small spaces. To maximize space, try to use dual purpose furniture. An
      example would be a that opens up for magazine or pillow storage avoids
      the need for space that would be taken by a second dedicated item.
    4. Accessories – The accessories you use to decorate your house
      have an impact on how large or small it appears. Use light colored
      curtains to allow light to come in during the daytime. Choose light
      colored furniture, or as an expedient you can use light colored covers
      and accent pieces for the furniture, because choosing light colors will
      usually give a more relaxed, open appearance to the room.
    5. Storage Plan – Having efficient storage is an important
      consideration in limited spaces. The more clutter in your home, the
      smaller and less attractive it will look. Select storage systems and
      solutions that fit your family’s needs and lifestyle. When you
      eliminate clutter, your house will seem more appealing to guests and
      prospective buyers – and you will be happier there too.
    6. Mirrors Can Add Size – Use wall mirrors in carefully planned
      locations to give the appearance of depth to a room. There is hardly
      anything you can do that will be more effective in making a room appear
      to be larger. Mirrors can be attractive in themselves, and they serve
      the additional and very pertinent purpose of adding apparent size
      rather directly to a small room.

     

    These techniques can save you a lot of expense and effort in the
    necessary task of making it more attractive and marketable. Given all
    the things you have to do in preparing a home for sale, these
    suggestions are among the best ways to improve the value of your home
    as well as simply making it look great.

    This content was provided by your Denver real estate experts in Colorado, Automated Homefinder.

  • world’s tiniest violin playing for UK estate owners

    Apparently, the descendents of the English super-rich are burdened with the maintenance costs of their rapidly-crumbling estates, and must nibble away at their fortunes – accrued, as one Metafilter commenter notes, "through centuries of feudalism, tenanting and clearances," – just to keep these structures from falling down. And the National Trust isn’t well funded to cover the costs of maintaining any but the most "exceptional" properties.

    It comes down to the rich looking for handouts while the thousands of historic homes owned and lived in by working people must be maintained on our own dime. "To those who have much, more will be given; to those who have little, more will be taken away" – the key to socialism for the rich, the only kind of socialism we have here in the US, and apparently something the rich require more of in the UK.

  • Durham bungalow saved from the wrecker

     407 Ottawa in Durham NC was recently saved from death-by-backhoe when neighbors bought off the wrecking company with $900 in cash. Obviously the city doesn't give two craps about historic preservation; at least this neighborhood does.

    These people care so passionately about the preservation of their
    neighborhood, they are willing to personally sacrifice to ensure its
    viability – a viability that is still threatened on all sides. One
    neighbor has called up the trustee and offered to pay him $10,000 for
    the house – primarily to prevent it from being torn down. (I'm sure she
    doesn't really want another house.)

    To be clear, these weren't
    city bulldozers this time. But the city – council- needs to do more to
    protect the integrity of the historic areas of our city. This portion
    of Cleveland-Holloway is not yet a local historic district, although
    they are working hard to become one.

    And that's just it – the
    citizens, all of whom have jobs and lives to live are required to fight
    tooth and nail to simply keep the neighborhood they have. The onus is
    on them, rather than the city making proactive efforts to have
    preservation be a priority. The departments will say "we can't do
    [whatever]" – and it's true, because the leadership of this city does
    not promote historic preservation. My understanding is that the mayor's
    appointee position on the Historic Preservation Commission has sat
    vacant for – a year? Members of the council want to eliminate property
    tax reductions for individual local landmarks. The Historic Commission
    has been disempowered by a city finding that, if NIS deems a property
    unsafe, demolition permits can be issued without the consent of the HPC.

    Why
    must citizens like those in Cleveland-Holloway swim upstream constantly
    to save their neighborhoods? Why is the quickest and easiest way for a
    property owner to deal with fines from code enforcement to proceed with
    demolition? Why isn't the city leadership their partner, by creating
    city policy that protects these resources – rather than making the
    barriers to preservation ever-harder to overcome?

    note: apologies to the kind folks at Endangered Durham for using the image without their permission. It has now been removed.

  • historic homes in Redlands, California

    David Estes, aka Flickr user Cyclotourist, lives in Redlands – a town of about 60,000 near San Bernardino in Southern California. Redlands is not particular noteworthy compared to some of its neighbors, but it does have several attractive neighborhoods chock-full of well-maintained historic homes, including Victorians, Mission Revival and Craftsman – and all sorts of variants, like Tudor, Georgian and Queen Anne – structures. Together with several contributors, Estes has put together a photo pool of close to 150 Redlands historic homes, spanning the full gamut of the area’s most popular architectural styles. Unfortunately, the constant encroachment of commercial and industrial structures puts some of the prettiest small homes at risk. I’d be happy living in this one. Or maybe this one, with plenty of work. Just maybe not this one.

  • beautiful Illinois bungalows slated for demolition

    95harrison
    To make room for gardens and other landscaping around a neighborhood drug and alcohol treatment center, several historic properties in Charleston IL will be razed in upcoming weeks. The homes – 5, 15, 21 and 95 Harrison (see photograph by Ken Trevarthan) – are in various styles, 95 being a brick and stucco bungalow of a type common in this part of the state. The neighborhood is not part of a historic district, so the demolition permit has no reason not to proceed, according to local officials. Neighbors are unhappy that the homes are being torn down – especially the two best looking and most sturdy of the structures – instead of being moved or integrated into CEAD (the Central East Alcoholism and Drug Council) plans. Two neighbors noted that the house at 95 Harrison was the most significant (and furthest away from the planned development), and while they did not begrudge CEAD’s decision to legally raze the properties, they did suggest that leaving the building intact would greatly increase the neighborhood’s opinion of CEAD and this particular program.

  • new architecture, new materials, new reading

    Even though I’m not interested in living in a modern house, I’ve always been interested in the new materials that contemporary designers use – many of which are much more environmentally sound than the materials of two decades ago – and I find that there’s a lot the old-house scene can learn from the various technological tricks developed by today’s architects and designers.

    Just as Maybeck constantly experimented with new materials and techniques to maintain heat in the winter and cool in the summer, I think there’s plenty of room for old-house remodelers and DIY-types to expand our knowledge from the experiments going on in the various alternative-shelter movements.

    There are a jillion blogs devoted to experimental architecture and repurposing of various engineering techniques and materials. Here are a few from my irregular reading list; maybe they will be interesting and/or useful to you: