…Just make sure you do (mostly) the opposite of whatever this woman tells you to:
From Rita St. Clair's house/come column in today's Chicago Daily Herald:
Bargains are always alluring, and never more so than
now. But while good deals can indeed be had in today's housing market,
the "buyer beware" rule remains very much in force in regard to
fixer-uppers. An old, or even not so old, home that "needs some work"
can prove to be a great buy or a financial sinkhole, depending in part
on the dimensions of the buyer's dreams.
In deciding whether to invest in an old house, my
advice is to resist the cute-puppy syndrome and to make an
unsentimental assessment of how much a rehab will really cost. Then
weigh your willingness to bend the project to fit your budget.
Q. We need advice regarding the semicircular front hall
staircase in an old Dutch Colonial style home we recently bought. A
previous owner stained the oak steps and the entire balustrade,
including the stringer. It's a medium stain but still looks pretty
heavy in an average size entranceway with a wooden floor and with lots
of wood paneling and moldings. We had intended to cover the stairs with
a patterned carpet, but that turns out to be difficult and expensive
because of the circular turn in the staircase. Can you suggest a
different treatment?
A. The simplest of several options is to paint most of
the woodwork – not just the staircase itself but the adjacent moldings
as well. In a relatively small space, I'd go with a light color for all
the painted surfaces, including the stringer, the spindles on the
railing and the risers but not the tread of the stairs. Then, to
produce an attractive contrast, I would use a dark stain on the floor,
the treads of the steps and the staircase's handrail.
Paint over the wood?! This woman should not be writing a column on restoration, conservation or style in general! That's just ridiculous, and is an absolutely last-ditch option when all else fails. Why ruin future generations' enjoyment of the space just to save a few bucks? It's not worth it – we have a duty to conserve our homes, not ruin them … I assume this person would also advocate covering coved plaster ceilings with acoustic texture, putting plastic slipcovers on furniture instead of, you know, actually sitting on it, carpeting over hardwood floors…
She starts with good advice and then veers into the ridiculous, stupid, and cruel. And to top it off, after this excerpted portion, she goes on to advocate carpeting stair treads in Arts & Crafts homes, a practice that Gustav Stickley himself once (purportedly) called "an abomination." Yes, accent and show off your beautiful wood by covering it up. Pave the backyard, too, while you're at it.
What would you recommend for real wood trim and doors but that are in a stain the owner hates?
I don’t have a period house (it is maybe 10 yrs old) so real restoration is not an issue. Unfortunately, however, I hate the orangy-tinted stain that is all over the house (no, I’m not the original homeowner). I’ve gotten used to it over the years, but I still don’t like it.
For a 2 story house, with baseboard, door trim and doors plus stairs, the idea of having it all refinished is a nightmare. I can’t imagine how much it would cost, and so painting over it seems like a much more manageable and affordable solution. (esp when the doors and trim are not a nice flat surface, but instead have a lot of grooves).
For someone who can handle painting but not refinishing, please convince me! [for example, would it be more affordable to try to sell the trim/doors and start from scratch??]